Ranked as a Leading junior in 'Employment', Thomas Cordrey is "pragmatic in his advice and highly organised." Legal 500 2017
"He does not browbeat witnesses but can secure confessions from them by tactical questioning, and he has a very good manner with the tribunal." Chambers UK 2017
"He is extremely well organised; he gives first-rate legal analysis and his structured application to cases enables him to assimilate very complex facts." Chambers UK 2017
"Very approachable, clever and a pleasure to deal with." Legal 500 2016
"Extremely intelligent, calm and measured." Chambers UK 2016
"First-rate legal analysis" "Highly praised for his intelligent, meticulous approach to issues, he acts for both claimants and respondents" Chambers UK 2016
"Acts at all levels, and has undertaken significant work in the High Court and EAT" Chambers UK 2015
"Complementary expertise" in employment, personal injury and commercial law Chambers UK 2015
"Credited by sources for his impressive style of advocacy" Chambers UK 2014
Chambers UK 2019
Has established a strong employment practice, with notable expertise in complex TUPE issues and discrimination cases. He undertakes a significant amount of appellate advocacy. "A fantastic junior who is meticulous in his preparation and an excellent advocate. He gives good, clear advice." "Responsive and easy to work with." Represented the respondent in De Souza v Vinci Construction, a Court of Appeal case which determined that a 10% uplift must be applied to the compensation of all successful discrimination claimants.
Legal 500 2019
"He has a good eye for the detail but also keeps the bigger picture in mind."
Legal 500 2017
"He is pragmatic in his advice and highly organised."
Chambers UK 2017
Has established a strong employment practice, with notable expertise in complex TUPE issues and discrimination cases. Sources highlight his impressive advocacy in tribunal settings, most notably how he clearly delivers his submissions and arguments. "He does not browbeat witnesses but can secure confessions from them by tactical questioning, and he has a very good manner with the tribunal." "He is extremely well organised; he gives first-rate legal analysis and his structured application to cases enables him to assimilate very complex facts." Acted in a highly complex TUPE case on behalf of the Secretary of State for Health that considered an important estoppel point. The case has been heard in both the High Court and the EAT. - Employment
Legal 500 2016
Thomas is "Very approachable, clever and a pleasure to deal with."
Chambers UK 2016
Acts for a range of significant clients in employment disputes, both in tribunal and at the High Court. Highly praised for his intelligent, meticulous approach to issues, he acts for both claimants and respondents. "His first-rate legal analysis allows him to assimilate very complex facts. He is extremely intelligent, calm and measured." "Thorough, approachable and easy to work with." Acted successfully in a lengthy disability discrimination claim, appearing on behalf of the respondent, British Telecom. - Employment
Chambers UK 2015
An up-and-coming employment barrister with complementary expertise in personal injury and commercial law. He acts at all levels, and has undertaken significant work in the High Court and EAT.
Expertise: "He's very gentle, which is good with clients." "He is very clear about his analysis of things, and when necessary he will go away and sift evidence. He's very organised in his approach."
Recent work: Advised the appellant in Northbert Dentressangle v Hutton, a case concerning the limitation period for bringing an unfair dismissal claim. - Employment
Chambers UK 2014
Practises across the entire employment spectrum, but is best known for his work on religious discrimination. He is credited by sources for his impressive style of advocacy.
Expertise: "Very good on discrimination cases, he's able to absorb and analyse a lot of complex detail very quickly."
Recent work: He was involved in McFarlane v Relate Avon, a religious discrimination case. - Employment
Thomas’ practice encompasses the full employment spectrum. He is the youngest editor of Harvey on Industrial Relations and Employment Law, has appeared 25 times in the EAT and is experienced in the Court of Appeal. In recent Court of Appeal cases Thomas has been complimented by Underhill LJ (who described being assisted by Thomas’ “clear and focused skeleton argument and oral submissions”) and Gross LJ (who said “I would pay tribute to the logical and cogent argument advanced by Mr Cordrey"). Thomas has acted for high-profile Claimants and Respondents and is experienced in multi-day High Court litigation and familiar with the Civil Procedure Rules. As part of Thomas’ role on the Bar Council's legislative and guidance subcommittee he is co-author of the Bar Council’s Tackling Sexual Harassment Guide.
Further information about Thomas’ practice:
Memberships: Thomas is a member of ELA and ELBA. He is also a member of the Bar Council’s Legislation & Guidance sub-group.
Thomas specialises in religious discrimination and human rights law and advises on a range of topics with a particular focus on the right to freedom of religion and the right to freedom of expression. According to Chambers UK 2014 Thomas "is best known for his work on religious discrimination”. He has advised numerous charities on issues arising from the Equality Act 2010 and other legislation such as the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013, considering their effect on religious service providers. He advises on the application of Articles 9 & 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights to judicial review of decisions restraining freedom of religious expression.
Examples of Thomas’ cases include: acting for a church in one of the few marriage discrimination claims to reach the EAT (Gould v Trustees of St John Downshire Hill (2017) UKEAT/0115/17); representing a Christian teacher who was under threat of being struck off after making public posts on Facebook, some of which related to his religious beliefs (Evans v General Teaching Council for Wales (2014)); and acting as junior counsel for a Relate counsellor who had been dismissed for declining to provide certain therapies because of his religious beliefs (McFarlane v Relate Avon Plc  ICR 507).
Thomas is co-author of a report on freedom of speech and freedom of religion which the Prime Minister referred to in the House of Commons: during PMQs Theresa May MP welcomed the report and quoted Thomas’ words that freedom of religion is a ‘jealously guarded principle’. The report received coverage in the Telegraph and other national press.
Until recently Thomas was also author of Bloomsbury Professional's Discrimination Law chapter on religious exceptions to the Equality Act 2010 and he sat on the Bar Council's Equality & Diversity Committee for a number of years – he is now part of the Bar Council's Legislation & Guidance Committee. Thomas drafted the Bar Council’s briefing on the Equality Act 2010 and the Bar Council’s Tackling Sexual Harassment Guide. He has spoken internationally on the topics of human rights and religious discrimination and has spent time working with NGOs at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.
In 2012 Thomas was called to give evidence to a Parliamentary Committee considering the state of legal protection for religious groups. Thomas also has extensive media experience in this field and has been interviewed on BBC1, BBC News 24, CNN and Channel 4 and on Radio 4's Today Programme and Radio 5 Live. He was featured in The Lawyer, commenting on the European Court of Human Rights' landmark decision in Eweida. He has also had a number of articles published in the Employment Lawyers Association briefing on this topic.
Thomas has experience in advising employers, service providers and professional associations on religious discrimination issues arising from the European Convention on Human Rights and the Equality Act 2010.
Cases Thomas has been involved with (either as counsel, or assisting counsel) include:
Thomas has experience of advising on and acting in a range of commercial law proceedings in both the Court of Appeal, High Court and County Courts.
In 2017 Thomas appeared in the Court of Appeal as junior counsel in Toombs v Bridging Loans  EWCA Civ 205, instructed by a lender in a case arising out of a valuer's negligence. The case concerned the Nykredit line of authority, considering the largely untested question of how to assess the date of damage in security valuation claims. Thomas previously appeared, unled, in the High Court appeal (Bridging Loans Limited v Toombs  EWHC 4566 (QB)) and at the first instance hearing in front of the High Court Master.
In the last 12 months Thomas has also appeared, unled, in a four day High Court breach of contract trial in Grainger v North East London NHS Foundation Trust  EWHC 2254 (QB);  IRLR 981 and represented the Secretary of State for Health in a 3 day High Court breach of contract estoppel and res judicata case (Srivatsa v Secretary of State for Health  EWHC 2916 (QB);  ICR D5). The Srivatsa case has already been applied in 2017 by the High Court in Treetop Investment LLC v Falmouth House Freehold Co Ltd  EWHC 674 (Ch). The Court of Appeal, Lewison LJ, has given the Claimant permission to appeal the Srivatsa decision and the appeal will be heard in 2018. In the Srivatsa litigation Thomas also acted in several interlocutory hearings before High Court Masters and an appeal in the High Court.
In 2017 Thomas has been instructed as junior counsel for the Claimant on a high value professional negligence action relating to tax advice on a corporate transaction and has also acted for the claimant in the pre-action stages of a solicitors’ negligence claim.
In 2016 Thomas was instructed in a High Court dispute concerning the refusal of a global insurance company to allow an insured to instruct an international law firm under the terms of before-the-event legal expenses insurance. This is one in a long series of cases Thomas has acted in following his instruction as junior counsel at both High Court (Brown Quinn v Equity Syndicate  EWHC 2661 (Comm);  1 All E.R. 778) and Court of Appeal in Brown-Quinn v Equity Syndicate Management Ltd  EWCA Civ 1633;  1 WLR 1740, described by Burton J as a "test case" on the application of LEI. The case created widespread interest in the legal market and media including articles in The Lawyer, Law Gazette and The Post Online.
Other examples of Thomas' insurance law practice include, in 2017, advising a Claimant on his position under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 and in 2016, representing Allianz Insurance plc at a contested hearing in the Mercantile Court and advising Arag plc on a defence to a claim relating to an untested provision of the Insurance Companies (Legal Expenses Insurance) Regulations 1990.
Further cases in which Thomas has acted include W v HC where he represented the executor of an estate in a High Court breach of contract claim which resulted in a six figure settlement; Aslam v Camelot plc in which he represented the Defendant in a Norwich Pharmacal application by the Claimant for disclosure of the details of a National Lottery winner; Penycate v Wembley National Stadium in which he represented Wembley stadium in a County Court breach of contract claim; and Revenue & Customs Comrs v Benchdollar  EWHC 1310 (Ch)  1 All E.R. 174 in which he acted as second junior counsel for HMRC at the pre-trial stages of a multi million pound NIC claim.
Thomas also has experience of acting in cases under the Arbitration Act 1996 and has received in-house arbitration training and in-house mediation training. He is a member of COMBAR and PNBA.
In relation to COMBAR Thomas sits on the Equality & Diversity Committee and has previously attended the North America conference, assisting Colin Edelman QC speaking on the topic of the Bermuda Form.
Thomas advises and acts in a range of insurance disputes. For example, he has acted in a long series on the scope of an insured’s right to choose their own lawyer under a policy of legal expenses insurance. In a recent example, Thomas was instructed in a High Court dispute concerning the refusal of a global insurance company to allow an insured to instruct an international law firm under the terms of before-the-event legal expenses insurance. Thomas was junior counsel, led by Colin Wynter QC, acting for the Claimants in the 2 day High Court trial of Brown Quinn v Equity Syndicate  EWHC 2661 (Comm);  1 All E.R. 778, described by Burton J as a "test case" in the LEI field.
Thomas remained instructed as junior counsel when the Defendants appealed to the Court of Appeal where the Law Society received permission to intervene on behalf of the Claimants, and three of Europe's leading insurance companies intervened on behalf of the Defendants. The decision by the appellate court (Brown-Quinn v Equity Syndicate Management Ltd  EWCA Civ 1633;  1 WLR 1740) remains the leading domestic authority and attracted widespread interest in the legal market and media including in articles in The Lawyer, Law Gazette and The Post Online.
Other examples of Thomas' insurance law practice include, in 2017, advising a Claimant on his position under the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 (including in relation to the complicated transitional provisions and the insurer’s right to rely on a notification defence). In 2016 Thomas represented Allianz Insurance plc at a contested hearing in the Mercantile Court and advised Arag plc on a defence to a claim relating to an untested provision of the Insurance Companies (Legal Expenses Insurance) Regulations 1990 (Hardwicke Motor Company Limited v Arag plc (3YM24927)).
Thomas has also advised in relation to losses recoverable under a home insurance policy following the insurer's efforts to avoid the policy for non-disclosure. The advice covered complex matters around recoverability of remote losses and the limits of recovery under the Ombudsman scheme. Separately he has issued an application under section 18 of the Arbitration Act 1996 on behalf of a client following an insurer's refusal to pay out for damage to vintage cars assessed by a joint expert.
Thomas is an active member of COMBAR, he sits on the Equality & Diversity Committee, has previously attended the North American COMBAR conference and has spoken to law students at the annual Lincoln's Inn pupillage fair, giving an introduction to commercial law.
In Bridging Loans Limited v Toombs  EWHC 4566 (QB) Thomas appeared, unled, in a High Court appeal, instructed by a lender in a case arising out of valuer's negligence. The case concerned the Nykredit line of authority, considering the largely untested question of how to assess the date of damage in security valuation claims. When the case went to the Court of Appeal in 2017 Thomas remained instructed, as junior counsel (Toombs v Bridging Loans  EWCA Civ 205). In that case Thomas appeared against Stephen Innes, 4 New Square, at the first instance hearing in front of the High Court Master and in the appeal before HHJ Seymour QC.
In 2017 Thomas has been instructed as junior counsel for the Claimant on a high value professional negligence action relating to tax advice on a corporate transaction and has also acted for the claimant in the pre-action stages of a solicitors’ negligence claim. Thomas is experienced in drafting letters of response, defences and advising on the prospects of success in, for example, PI claims covering solicitors and valuers. Recent issues he has addressed include duty, breach, causation and contributory negligence in relation to various property transactions and loans, raising points about the interpretation of lending criteria and the CML Handbook as well as the correct interpretation of the terms of a deed, facility letter and associated contractual documentation.
Thomas has lectured on potential claims against intermediaries / brokers and specifically looked at the possible expansion in the role of breach of fiduciary duty in this context. He has also spoken at seminars on current developments in lawyer's negligence claims and he also spoken many times on the complex SAAMCO litigation – and has advised an investment company considering an action against a law firm for negligence in relation to a large transaction.
Thomas has a good grounding in the work of surveyors - he is regularly instructed by Countrywide Surveyors Ltd in relation to employment matters. An example of cross-over from his employment practice is Richardson v Copley Clark & Bennett LLP (UKEAT/0866/09) in which Thomas won permission to appeal from HHJ Peter Clarke in a case centring on the reasonable standards expected of a solicitor in a complex conveyance. Thomas also has experience of advising vis-a-vis the practice of solicitors in personal injury work - most recently considering failure to plead certain heads of loss in a valuable claim.
In other areas Thomas has, for example, represented a defendant payroll provider in a County Court claim alleging failure to meet the reasonable standards of that profession (Irenicon v Integrated Solutions).
Thomas is a member of the PNBA and COMBAR.
As well as drafting pleadings and settling schedules, Thomas advises on fast track and multi track cases in relation to liability and quantum. He also accepts instructions to appear at inquests. Thomas is a PIBA member.
Thomas' recent cases include:
As well as drafting pleadings, settling schedules and appearing at CCMCs, Thomas has experience of advising on fast track and multi track cases in relation to liability and quantum. He also accepts instructions to appear at inquests. Thomas is a PIBA member.
Thomas' cases include:
ELA, ELBA, PNBA
Lincoln's Inn Hardwicke Scholarship
Lincoln's Inn Tancred Studentship
Cambridge University Squire Scholarship
Adderley Prize for Law
Mrs Payne (1610) Scholarship
Bar Vocational Course at BPP Law School, London
MA (Law) (Cantab) at St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge
Thomas is a member of the Lawyers' Christian Fellowship: "Seek justice, love mercy, walk humbly with God" (Micah 6:8)