Andrew specialises in complex commercial, employment and industrial disputes, particularly injunctions. He has featured in some of the leading appellate cases in insurance law and trade disputes in recent years including Durham v BAI (Run Off) Ltd (the Employers' Liability Policy Trigger Litigation), Malone & Ors v British Airways Plc (the BA cabin crew litigation), ASLEF v London Midland, RMT v Serco (the key authority on strike injunctions) and Prophet plc v Huggett on restrictive covenant injunctions. He acted for Royal Mail in its injunction to prevent the 2017 national postal strike (Royal Mail Group v CWU).
Prominent recent cases include:
whether it is discrimination for shared parental leave to be paid at less than maternity pay - Capita v Ali  IRLR 586
qualification of arbitrators for reinsurance disputes – Allianz Insurance Plc v Tonicstar Ltd  1 Lloyd's Rep 389
restrictions on contractual changes in relation to collective bargaining (the s.145B issue) – Kostal v Dunkley  ICR 768
compensatory rest breaks for transport workers – Crawford v Network Rail  IRLR 714
Ahir v British Airways  EWCA Civ 1392 - fixed term workers and striking out
Pinaud v British Airways  EAT - part-time workers pay and the British Airways holiday pay claims;
a committal for contempt of court arising from breach of undertakings in a confidentiality and restrictive covenant injunction – Plant Health Care v Holohan  EWHC 1119 (QB)
a reinsurance aggregation dispute relating to losses arising from one event- Simmonds v Gammell  EWHC 2515 (Comm);
In addition to acting for British Airways Andrew has acted for London bus companies, BT, Post Office, South West Trains and Citylink in industrial disputes, including wildcat action, picketing and transport blockades and in contract actions for the Co-operative Group, Network Rail and Turning Point. He has recently appeared in recognition and EWC claims in the CAC, in insurance disputes in the Commercial Court and contract actions in the DIFC Court of Appeal.
Andrew is a co-author of the Law of Reinsurance with Colin Edelman QC (2nd Ed. 2013) and Bean on Injunctions (12th Ed. 2015). He is also co-general editor of Discrimination Law (Bloomsbury Professional).
In 2015 Andrew was Lawyer Monthly Labour & Employment Barrister of the Year UK and in 2016 Finance Monthly Employment Barrister of the Year.
Respected commercial silk who maintains an insurance and reinsurance practice that includes a strong focus on litigation arising out of employer liability and professional negligence. He also has experience in D&O cases, coverage disputes and insurance claims related to personal injury. "Bright, commercial and good with clients." "Energetic, knowledgeable, and a good advocate." Acted in Redman v Zurich Insurance, a dispute regarding the application of the Third Party Act 2010 to insurers when a defendant is insolvent. - Insurance, Chambers UK Bar 2019
Advises clients on a broad range of employment matters, with a focus on industrial disputes and notable experience of whistle-blowing and discrimination issues. He often acts for major private-sector employers. "Very bright, pragmatic and able. He has great attention to detail and inspires confidence." "Good with clients and approachable. He commands respect and is a firm advocate on his feet. He is able to cut through complex cases to distil the key issues." Represented Addison Lee in claims by GMB trade union representatives and members that they were dismissed due to their trade union activities, and in claims by drivers that they are workers. - Employment, Chambers UK Bar 2019
‘First class; he is cogent, succinct and has real presence in court.’ - Insurance and Reinsurance, Legal 500 2019
‘He commands respect and is a firm advocate when on his feet.’ - Employment, Legal 500 2019
Advises clients on a broad range of employment matters, including complex industrial disputes and discrimination issues, among other areas. Sources praise his strong advocacy and cross-examination skills, noting that he is especially talented in injunctive relief and whistle-blowing matters. “A very bright, pragmatic and able lawyer with great attention to detail, inspiring confidence and very good client-handling skills.” “He is the complete package. Clever, articulate, a great drafter and a devastating cross-examiner." Successfully defended the Co-operative Group in a whistle-blowing claim brought against various senior members by the procurement director. - Employment, Chambers UK 2018
Respected commercial silk who maintains an insurance and reinsurance practice that includes a strong focus on litigation arising out of employer liability and professional negligence. He also has experience in D&O cases, coverage disputes and insurance claims related to personal injury. "Very hands-on, very good with clients and someone who understands the perspective that insurers have. He is very astute in ensuring the advice he provides is pitched in the way clients need it to be provided, and he has a very deft touch in cross-examination." Represented the excess reinsurers in a high-profile dispute which considered whether the high volume of respiratory claims arising from the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks were to be aggregated as losses ‘arising from’ that ‘event’ and whether a reinsurer could challenge the assessment of expert insurance arbitrators as an ‘error of law.’ - Insurance, Chambers UK 2018
"He is very committed and proactive" - Employment, Legal 500 2017
A silk who can claim a growing insurance practice that includes a strong focus on cases arising out of employer liability and professional negligence. "He is knowledgeable, clever and a good advocate." "He's easy to work with and a safe pair of hands." Advised Bar Mutual Indemnity Fund on insurance issues arising out of a professional negligence case relating to the settlement of a discrimination claim. - Insurance, Chambers UK 2017
Advises clients on a broad range of employment matters, including complex industrial disputes and discrimination issues, among other areas. Sources praise his strong advocacy and cross-examination skills, noting that he is especially talented in injunctive relief and whistle-blowing matters. "He is very bright, has got great attention to detail and has a good manner in tribunal and cross-examinations." "He is very good, but he is particularly good on strike injunctions and industrial action." Successfully defended British Airways after 115 former BMI employees claimed automatic unfair redundancy, following BMI's takeover by British Airways. Claims were complicated by allegations of indirect sex and age discrimination. - Employment, Chambers UK 2017
"His expertise and knowledge in this practice area are second to none" - Employment, Legal 500 2016
Andrew is recommended in both employment and insurance. Recent editions of Chambers & Partners UK, the Legal 500, Who's Who Legal and Legal Experts have said:
A new silk whose insurance and reinsurance practice is centred on employment, contract and industrial disputes. He has recently handled a number of D&O cases. Advised in a case concerning the construction of contracts with relation to an employer's liability insurance - Chambers UK 2016
He marshals the arguments well and is a compelling advocate - Legal 500 2015
He's down to earth and personable, gets on with people and is unfazed by difficult issues. A very competent advocate
Wins acclaim for his broad insurance practice and is enjoying a swiftly growing profile. He provides unfussy, concise advice and always gives a firm opinion in a no-nonsense manner. He is an absolute pleasure to deal with, as he does not stand on ceremony and is highly personable.
His instructing solicitors greatly appreciate his collaborative style of working and his calm manner. Andrew Burns attacks a case with ‘real intellectual vigour.
Blessed with "crisp and concise writing skills, Andrew Burns is considered extremely confident and a friendly face on any case. He has lately been advising victims in the EL Trigger litigation. A sterling commercial employment practice.
Has particular technical knowledge of the law surrounding injunctions, and acts in commercial, industrial and employment disputes. His advocacy is widely praised by respondents, as is his tactical acumen. He is very thorough, excellent with clients and a real tactician. Thorough and unflappable, he has a good tribunal manner and a deceptively low key, but extremely effective, cross-examination technique. Acted in a collective claim brought by the Manchester-based ground staff of BMI, who were made redundant after the acquisition of the airline by British Airways - Chambers UK 2016
He is always quick to get to the central commercial issues; he marshals the arguments well - Legal 500 2015
An incredible eye for detail - Who's Who Legal 2016
He's very clever and at the same time great with clients. He's the go-to person for industrial relations advice. Thorough but always prepared to consider a different point of view.
The approachable and charming Andrew Burns is commended for his hard-working, enthusiastic and knowledgeable manner.
Increasingly popular for industrial relations issues. Burns is extremely quick to get to the heart of difficult issues, and his enthusiasm and positive nature make him "a key asset to any team.
Super diligent, sensibly bullish and an absolute pleasure to deal with, he has attracted big-name clients such as British Airways and Royal Mail.
A measured and intelligent advocate. Possesses the ability to cut away the smoke and mirrors... in a precise and methodical fashion. An impressive practice in disability, race and sex discrimination
Exceptionally able ... ability to quickly get to grips with complex matters
Andrew appeared in the Court of Appeal in Allianz Insurance Plc v Tonicstar Ltd  EWCA Civ 434 concerning the qualification of arbitrators for reinsurance disputes. Andrew has wide experience in commercial litigation in the High Court and County Court as well as internationally - principally in the DIFC Courts - and arbitration . His main expertise arises out of insurance and insurance related litigation, but he has also advised in telecommunications and energy claims, as well as business disputes and commercial contract claims. He is advising on the construction of a substantial financial agency agreement and on the insurance and reinsurance issues arising from major injury claims under a PL policy.
He advised about claims under the Riot (Damages) Act 1886 in respect of the 2011 riots in London and other cities, drawing on his involvement in the Court of Appeal in Bedfordshire Police Authority v Constable (Syndicate 386)  Lloyd's Rep IR 607. He was invited to talk to senior claims managers on the topic at the Post Claims Club quarterly meeting.
Andrew acted for the successful reinsured in the recent appeal against an arbitration award concerning an aggregation dispute relating to losses arising from 9/11 dust inhalation claims - Simmonds v Gammell  2 Lloyd's Rep. 631. He is acting for a leading insurer in reinsurance claims arising from major injury claims. He acted in one of the lead cases in the Supreme Court in Employers' Liability Policy Trigger Litigation  1 WLR 867. The test cases were about the coverage of Employers' Liability insurance policies in respect of damages for mesothelioima victims. Andrew acted for the insured in a property insurance claim - Aviva Insurance v Brown  Lloyd's Rep IR 211. Eder J examined fraudulent means or devices and the definition of dishonesty in this insurance fraud trial.
Andrew appeared with Colin Edelman QC for Zurich in Horwood v Argos & Ors  Lloyd's Rep IR 453, the insurance coverage dispute arising out of the 'Toxic Sofas' group litigation order. He advised a large organisation on coverage of excess layer insurance policy in relation to a multi-million pound liability for accidental damage arising out of its business.
Andrew acts for a range of insurers in coverage disputes and policy interpretation points. His insurance practice is strong and he acts for well-known city insurance firms. He is an editor of The Law of Reinsurance with Colin Edelman QC. Andrew represented successful insureds and their families in the Supreme Court in Employers' Liability Policy Trigger Litigation  1 WLR 867,  ICR 574,  Lloyd's Rep. IR 371 about the coverage of Employers' Liability insurance policies in respect of damages for mesothelioma victims. He appeared in Redman v Zurich Insurance Plc  1 WLR 280 concerning long-tail claims under the Third Party (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010.
Andrew also acted for the insured in an insurance fraud case which has been the subject of much comment - Aviva Insurance v Brown  Lloyd's Rep IR 211. He is advising on the insurance and reinsurance issues arising from major injury claims under a PL policy.
Andrew acted for the successful reinsured in the appeal against an arbitration award concerning an aggregation dispute relating to losses arising from 9/11 dust inhalation claims - Simmonds v Gammell  2 Lloyd's Rep. 631. He is acting for a leading insurer in reinsurance claims arising from major injury claims. Andrew appeared in the Court of Appeal in Allianz Insurance Plc v Tonicstar Ltd  EWCA Civ 434 concerning the qualification of arbitrators for reinsurance disputes.
In Horwood v Argos & Ors  Lloyd's Rep IR 453, Andrew acted for Zurich in the insurance coverage dispute arising out of the 'Toxic Sofas' group litigation order. He has acted for a UK insurer in a brokers' D&O claim and for a leading US professional indemnity insurer on a coverage claim in the Commercial Court. He advised a large organisation on coverage of excess layer insurance policy in relation to a multi-million pound liability for accidental damage arising out of its business.
Andrew appeared in MJ Harrington v Axa Oyak Sigorta  Lloyd's Rep. IR 60 and in Tektrol v. International Ins Co of Hanover  2 Lloyds Rep 701, CA an appeal on the construction of exclusion clauses in property insurance policies. He also appeared in Countrywide v. Marshall  Lloyd's Rep IR 195 on aggregation in insurance claims and in Jacobs v. Coster  Lloyd's Rep IR 506, CA an authority on late notification.
Andrew has experience in advising insurers and claimants about claims under the Riot (Damages) Act 1886 in respect of the 2011 riots in London and other cities, as he was in Bedfordshire Police Authority v Constable (Syndicate 386)  Lloyd's Rep IR 607. He talked to senior claims managers on the topic at the Post Claims Club quarterly meeting.
In addition to general commercial litigation in the High Court and County Court, Andrew has experience of ADR, mediation in particular, in a wide range of commercial disputes. He has acted for a range of insurers and for many commercial city solicitors. He specialises in contractual construction particularly of commercial documents, but advises on a wide range of national and international disputes, often arising out of the insurance sector or in connection with professional negligence.
Andrew has recently appeared in some of the highest profile cases - for the Co-op in Harmeston v Co-operative Group, in Wilkinson: a finance director whistleblowing claim, for British Airways in the cabin crew litigation, for the train operators in the leading Court of Appeal authority on strike ballot requirements - RMT v Serco, and for BT in preventing its first national strike in 25 years. He appeared in Allen v TRW Systems  IRLR 699 on incorporation of a redundancy payment policy into contracts of employment in the Court of Appeal.
He is one of the ‘go-to’ barristers for Industrial Action litigation with cases for the London Bus companies and South West Trains over the pre-Olympic strikes, and he has advised on the threatened NHS and tanker driver strikes. Andrew has recently been involved in secondary action and unlawful picketing disputes, including preventing national strike action by the RMT at Citylink. This complements his busy injunction practice in relation to restrictive covenants and confidentiality claims, together with work on freezing injunctions and search orders.
Andrew acts and advises on team moves and post-termination restrictions, including for a leading engineering firm in the north-west and a major financial adviser. He succeeded in the Court of Appeal in Prophet plc v Huggett  EWCA Civ 1013;  IRLR 618 on the construction of restrictive covenants. Andrew is a co-author with Lord Justice Bean of Bean on Injunctions now in its 12th edition - one of the leading texts on the subject.
Andrew has continued to be busy for British Airways including appearing in the group race discrimination (Russo v British Airways  EqLR 987) and pay claims (Usher v BA) brought by various groups of cabin crew, as well as acting in trade union detriment claims and in the claims arising from the takeover of BMI. He has also acted for other airlines and ground handling companies including collective TUPE and redundancy actions arising from Gatwick, Liverpool and Glasgow airports in claims brought by group claimants or unions.
He is instructed by a wide range of the best employment firms in London and nationally as well as having a substantial commercial practice. Andrew has long been a recognised expert on disability discrimination having appeared in the seminal case on the DDA 1995: Jones v Post Office. Over the last year, he has acted in TUPE consultation multiples, difficult multi-day discrimination cases for the NHS, banks and for city solicitors. He also acts for claimants - and on behalf of a solicitor claimant against a 'magic circle' firm and in the widely reported Sitz v Oppenheimer claim - for the successful female trader against a merchant bank. He has been recommended by both Chambers UK and Legal 500 as a top employment barrister for many years.
Other reported Employment Cases include:
Andrew has developed a prominent practice in industrial action and trade dispute litigation, appearing in some of the leading cases of the last few years and advising parties to some of the highest profile trade disputes in the UK. He has recently acted for Royal Mail in stopping the 2017 national postal strike by injunction before Supperstone J (Royal Mail Group v CWU). He has expereince in industrial action disputes, pay disputes following strikes and legal action to combat alternative 'leverage' action. He has also advised a leading union about industrial action strategy.
Andrew advised a range of public sector employers about the 2011 day of strike action. He took part in the 2011 Laurence Stracey Debate at the V&A museum on Britain's strike laws. He is also acting for some large employers in relation to a series of collective consultation claims. He acted for BT in legal moves in response to a threatened 2010 national strike. The threat of industrial action was withdrawn on the day of the ballot result. In 2012 he acted for transport companies in legal actions against strikes called in support of an 'Olympic bonus' for transport workers, for a large utilities company facing industrial action, for two leading logistics and delivery companies facing protest and strike action, for a chain of education academies, an airport ground handling company and a major high street name.
Andrew appeared for the employers in ASLEF v London Midland and RMT v Serco Ltd  ICR 848, one of the leading cases on industrial action law. The Court of Appeal discharged the injunctions preventing strike action and held that the minor breaches of ballot notice provisions should not stop industrial action. Elias LJ took the opportunity to review and restate the law on inaccurate ballot notices. The result of the case was reported by BBC News, the Financial Times, the London Evening Standard, the Press Association and the Daily Express.
Andrew has been counsel for British Airways in various claims arising from the high profile contractual dispute over changes to crewing levels on the airline: Malone & Ors v British Airways Plc  ICR 125. BA succeeded in the interim injunction hearing in 2009, at the speedy trial in February 2010 and in the Court of Appeal. The outcome of the case was reported widely including in The Lawyer, The Independent, the Wall Street Journal, BBC News, the Press Association, Bloomberg and Reuters.
Andrew appeared in EDF Energy Powerlink v RMT  IRLR 114 getting an injunction from Blake J against a threatened strike on the London Underground on the basis that the RMT union had failed to give proper categories in its ballot notice.
Andrew acted for the employers in successfully defending interim relief claims by a senior union official of a rail union and an official of UNITE in S v N and J v F. Andrew has frequently appeared in the Central Arbitration Committee including Unite v ManpowerGroup EWC/15/2017 and Morgan & King v Safran Group EWC/8/2013 under the TICE Regulations and advised a major retailer about a CAC claim.
Andrew Burns QC has been an advocate of the DIFC Courts since 2010 when he acted on an application for immediate judgment under Part 24 of the DIFC Court Rules. He appeared for the successful claimant in McDuff v KBH Kaanuun Ltd CA-003-2014 in 2014. This leading Court of Appeal authority interpreted the important ‘reasonable employer’ test in Article 60 (4) of DIFC Employment Law 2005 (now Art 59A).
He also appeared in the DIFC Court of Appeal and, at first instance, in Wheatley v Simmons & Company International DIFC CA-001-2013; an appeal concerning contractual construction, particularly of minimum guaranteed bonus provisions. He has acted and advised in contractual claims involving banks and other financial institutions and has lectured in the DIFC on confidential information and restrictive covenants.
Andrew is an co-author of Bean on Injunctions - one of the leading books in this field.
As well as appearing for British Airways in the injunction claim up to and including the Court of Appeal in Malone & Ors v British Airways Plc  ICR 125, Andrew has acted for a variety of leading employers in relation to restrictive covenant disputes including team moves. He appeared in World Fuel Services v Aegean Marine Petroleum in which Blair J granted a springboard injunction against a marine fuel company based on a breach of confidence.
He succeeded in overturning the controversial Chancery Division decision in Prophet plc v Huggett  EWCA Civ 1013. The Court of Appeal held that a strict interpretation should be given to the construction of restrictive covenants in an expedited injunction claim.
Andrew acted for the employer in a recent committal for contempt of court arising from breach of undertakings in a confidentiality and restrictive covenant injunction – Plant Health Care v Holohan (2017, QBD, Jay J).
Andrew continues to be busy with a number of substantial restrictive covenant injunctions in the High Court, acting both for major businesses and for individuals. He acted for leading patent attorneys in a confidentiality injunction claim and for an international engineering company restraining activity outside the UK, as a well as a mortgage broker moving to a new employer. He has acted in obtaining and resisting High Court freezing injunctions involving disputes over security for costs, fortification and non-disclosure issues as well as a number of confidentiality injunctions.
He speaks regularly at seminars and conferences and writes for legal publications on the topic of employment and commercial injunctions, including Lexis Nexis Webinars and for the New Law Journal.
Andrew has a high profile equality practice and frequently writes and lectures on equality issues. Andrew has long been recognised as a leading expert in discrimination and was in some of the leading cases on the DDA 1995 including Jones v Post Office in the Court of Appeal and Ekpe v Comm of Metropolitan Police.
He acted for acted for Barclays Bank in high value discrimination claims and various NHS Trusts in a number of high profile discrimination and whistleblowing claims. He recently successfully acted for Zenith Bank in a race and religious discrimination claim which is pending in the EAT. He appeared for the claimant in Sitz v Oppenheimer Bank; a much publicised sex discrimination and victimisation claim against a US finance firm, and has a large religious discrimination claim against a US bank pending.
Andrew has acted in complex indirect discrimination and equal pay claims for clients such as British Airways and has successfully defended BT in a senior employee age discrimination claim. He has also recently advised upon, and represented clients in, large multiple fixed term worker claims.
Andrew acts for a range of insurers on professional negligence claims against insurance brokers, surveyors, valuers and financial advisers.
Andrew recently successfully defended a barrister in an unmeritorious, if complex, professional negligence claim concerning discrimination litigation - Begum v Neejam LLP (QBD, Birmingham DR, 9 December 2015) which included allegations of settlement at an undervalue and issues such as the assessment of loss of a chance in respect of discrimination compensation. He is also acting for solicitors in a claim by a high profile former executive.
He is presently acting in a High Court claim by a former Premier League chief executive against a leading firm of solicitors.
Andrew has acted for and against solicitors in solicitors’ negligence claims arising out of litigation and property transactions. He has been instructed on behalf of the BMIF to act for barristers (including a claim against a QC), particularly in employment disputes. Andrew has acted for HCCI or its insureds in professional indemnity disputes arising out of claims against architects, designers and engineers.
Andrew has acted in London arbitrations in both commercial and employment cases, with particular experience in insurance and reinsurance arbitrations. He is available to sit as an arbitrator, drawing on his judicial experience as a Recorder.
Andrew also has acted in numerous mediations, including judicial mediations. His collaborative style has led to numerous successfully mediated conclusions to complex disputes.
Andrew also acts as a mediator in commercial and employment disputes. He recently successfully mediated a complex discrimination dispute between senior managers and a multinational company.
Feedback from the parties on recent mediations includes:
"I think he did a terrific job, with two parties who were at loggerheads. He was calm, patient but firm which is everything you would want from a mediator and yet he made clear that he has clout as an experienced advocate in this subject area and therefore gave credibility to what he was saying." (City solicitor acting for the claimant in a complex High Court employment dispute).
Recorder of the Crown Court
Advocate, DIFC Courts, Dubai
Member of the Bar Standards Board Professional Conduct Committee (2007-2013)
Middle Temple Advocacy Tutor and member of the Equality and Diversity Committee
Middle Temple Education Committee (2009-2013)
Head of the Chambers Pupillage Committee (2007-2012)
Chair of the Chambers Supervision Committee (2016-)
BILA, COMBAR, LCLCBA, PNBA, ELA, ELBA, ELS
MA (Downing College, Cambridge)